Can the Maple Leafs get a similar return to last year for Roman Polak at the trade deadline?


© John E. Sokolowski-USA TODAY Sports

Who is Roman Polak, the hockey player? 

To some, he’s one-half of, arguably, the worst regular defensive pairing in hockey. To others, he’s actually a half-decent defenceman, and one with oodles of ‘character’, ‘grit’, ‘veteran presence’, and the like. 

The divide was never as apparent as it was last February, when the Toronto Maple Leafs shipped Polak, along with Nick Spaling, to the playoff-bound San Jose Sharks. In return, Toronto received Raffi Torres (well, Raffi Torres’ albatross contract), along with two second-round picks. 

Leafs fans, for the most part, were ecstatic. Many were hoping the team would flip the hulking d-man for, well, anything — never mind two second-rounders. 

Sure, Spaling was part of the deal, but he had only scored seven points in 35 games as a Leaf, and played just 12:45 per-game as a Shark. Polak was the central piece of this transaction. 

Sharks GM Doug Wilson, often talked about as one of the game’s top front-office minds, ponied up. One can infer that, because of the size of the offer, as well as how we know the hockey world thinks, he wasn’t the only one bidding for Polak’s services. 

Fast forward to today, over a year later. Toronto is in the thick of an intense playoff battle, with Polak back in the mix, quite literally anchoring their third defensive pairing. With the market for defensemen what it is, assuming Toronto’s open to shipping off an extremely replaceable asset in Roman Polak, can they expect a similar return? 



Believe it or not, last season with Toronto, Polak was working towards the second best offensive season of his career. Sure, a 19-point pace and a P60 of 0.92 don’t jump off the page, but it certainly didn’t hurt his case, either.  

This season, though, whatever was working for Polak before isn’t working for him now. He’s scoring at nearly half the rate he did last season (P60 of 0.47) and, outside of Matt Hunwick, is the worst regular Leafs d-man at generating offence, with a Rel.CF60 of -6.43. 

Granted, any team looking to acquire Roman Polak isn’t doing so because they need a scoring boost from the back-end. Still, the numbers warrant a look. Here’s how his last two seasons compare: 

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 2.23.06 PM

 Although Polak’s offensive numbers from last season weren’t great (except his Rel.SCF% of 6.2… What the hell?), they were clearly better than what he’s produced so far this year. 

Again, any team interested in trading for Polak isn’t doing so because they need secondary scoring. Regardless, the difference between this year and last year’s numbers bears mentioning. 


On the defensive side of the puck is (supposedly) Polak’s bread and butter, and where he’s made a name for himself throughout his career. 

Before getting in to the numbers, here’s a look at how Polak has influenced shot locations this year compared to last.


Polak shots against 2015_16


Polak shots against 2016_17

 Despite all the criticism Polak receives about his defensive abilities, he actually does a fairly good job of limiting shots from the home-plate area in front of the net. 

Last season, while he allowed a higher-than-average amount of shots from the point and middle of the ice, he did a spectacular job of thwarting the opposition’s attempts to get high-quality, in-tight chances. 

The numbers back this up. 

In 2015/16, Polak posted a Rel.SCA60 of -2.12, which was the best of seven regular Leafs defensemen. He also posted a Rel.SCF% of 6.2, which was by far the best mark of any Leafs player to suit up last season.

This year, however, Polak’s Rel.SCA60 and Rel.SCF% have worsened to 0.54 and 0.13, respectively. This puts him at the middle of the pack on a defensively-poor Leafs team, which is not the best of looks. 

Let’s look at the defensive numbers, side-by-side, from this year compared to last: 

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 1.45.26 PM

Huh, so maybe San Jose was on to something. 

To be fair, something that jumps out right off the bat is Polak’s usage. He’s starting more of his shifts in the defensive zone than he did last season, and of course, that’s going to skew the results against him. 

Still, though, Polak’s defensive numbers have deteriorated significantly. He’s allowing more shot attempts against, more scoring chances against, and his expected numbers all suggest that he’s trending downwards. 


Roman Polak’s game has not changed at all from last season. His usage, along with the type of hockey Toronto now plays, has. But Roman Polak the hockey player has not. 

Do the numbers back up a trade similar to the one Toronto pulled off last season? No, they don’t. However, Roman Polak appeals to the hockey traditionalist, and god knows there are at least a few of those kicking around among NHL front offices. 

I can almost hear the conversations brewing in a few front offices. 

”He brings a lot of compete to the table,” they’re saying. “He’s a guy who brings it night in and night out.”

The truth is, Roman Polak is a player who will never be judged by his numbers. He will always be talked about for how good of a teammate he is, how hard he plays, how fearless he is, and all the intangibles he brings to the table. 

For that reason, yes, it’s certainly reasonable, and almost probable, to believe that Toronto could flip him for a high pick. With a weak draft, along with the current market for defensemen and the amount of teams still in the playoff hunt, there’s no better time to gauge the market on a player like this. 

Will Roman Polak become Daniel Winnik 2.0? Leafs fans should certainly hope so. 

  • DukesRocks

    Evan are you scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find something to write about. Lets see last year we’re not contending for the playoff and this year we are. If we trade Polak for draft picks, who is replacing him in the lineup? There’s no logic to this article in my opinion. Why would you hurt the team by trading a defense man that you can’t replace presently for a fantasy person aka draft pick?

    • Evan Presement

      IMO, Marchenko and Marincin are both players who could easily replace Polak in the lineup. Honestly, I’d be hard pressed to find anyone who really believes this team is better with Polak in the lineup than without. Also, draft picks don’t suddenly become obsolete once you have a deep prospect pool. The more picks, the better.

      • DukesRocks

        Easily replace,,, Really. Marincin is a fuk up plain and simple. Hopefully one day he can put it together. And Marchenko I’ll have a wait and see opinion. If Marchenko can show he’s solid at the backend and can be that physical presence the team needs, it would make sense. However those are big ifs. Polak will get you a 3rd round AT BEST. You can’t use the 2nd round picks from last year as a gage and not include Reimer as part of the deal. If my option was a 3rd round pick vs the physical presence Polak brings and I’m in a playoff race, I’ll take Polak. The point being you can’t write an article based on unknown IF’s and presently I see anybody to replace him.

  • Stan Smith

    I question one stat you are showing his GA60 as 2.79. show him at 1.94, which is better than last season. Am I reading it wrong?

    Either way San Jose gave up an albatross of a contract and a 2nd for Polak last year, with the intention of playing him as a third pair dman, which they did with enough success to make the cup final. I can see someone doing the same this season.

    As for the speculation there was someone else vying for him I have the feeling the same would be said for the Leafs re-signing him. I feel the only way they would have paid $2.25M for his services this season was because someone else was looking to sign him. It is an indication of how the Leafs feel about him. Don’t be surprised if he is a Leafs when the puck drops on next season.

    • Evan Presement

      Hey, the stat I used was expected goals against/60, not raw GA60. And you’re right, they did, although his playoff numbers were really, really bad.

      And I wouldn’t be surprised either, just because Babcock seems to love the guy.

  • DukesRocks

    Hey Evan, TSN’s Overdrive is talking about this very subject, Bob MacKenzie asked who will you replace Polak with? And his answer was no trade for draft picks. Funny how people can see the obvious.

    • tealeaves

      If i could find a fancy stats lover that is able to blend 50% fancy stats and 50% mackenzie hockey logic (and it sad that I have to use him as an example) then I think we would actually get to a point where these stats make sense with player choice

  • tealeaves

    If Babcock wants to keep playing him then I don’t see him being traded.

    That is, he won’t get traded because there is not a buyer but he won’t be traded because Babcock values him more then the other options he has available (corrado, marchenko, marincin etc).

  • LukeDaDrifter

    Leaving Polak’s value to the team for a playoff run, to one side, what is the real return for trading our 5th rated defenceman Polak, for a draft pick. If we were to get a second round pick it would be a low pick from a team contending for the cup. The pick would most probably be somewhere in the 50’s. A player taken in the 50’s may or may not ever play a game in the NHL. Typically it will take 3 to 5 years to find out. If the Leafs are 100% sure they don’t want Polak next year then a draft pick may be worth while. Polak’s value as an intricate part of a good penalty-kill should not be taken lightly. There may be more value in signing him for next year and exposing him in the expansion draft?