How the Shanahan regime found a more suitable role for Dion Phaneuf

Photo Credit: John E. Sokolowski/USA TODAY Sports

For most of Dion Phaneuf’s Toronto Maple Leafs tenure, the club has relied on him to be a No. 1 defenseman. 

Though Toronto’s captain is still leading all Maple Leafs defensemen in ice-time per game, in a variety of ways, he’s holding down a more proscribed role in Toronto this season. And it suits him well.

In the not-so-distant past Phaneuf’s deployment as a 25-minute per night defender was extreme – less than 10 defenseman are averaging more than 25 per night this year and no more than 15 defensemen do in any given season. It was a demanding role that Phaneuf wasn’t all that well suited to frankly, though he managed decent results on occasion. 

A physical defenseman with a big shot, Phaneuf isn’t dynamic through the neutral zone at this stage of his career (and his speed seems likely to atrophy further with age). Passing and decision making hasn’t generally been a strength of his game either, which showed through more often when Phaneuf was averaging an additional two minutes at even strength every night. 

If deploying Phaneuf as a No. 1 defenseman was a hallmark of the Ron Wilson and Randy Carlyle eras, using him more sparingly has become a calling card of Brendan Shanahan’s regime. It’s a process that we’ve seen accelerate under Mike Babcock, who is using even Phaneuf in a secondary role on the penalty kill now. 

The process of paring down of the 30-year-old defenseman’s minutes started in earnest under Carlyle. After averaging more than 25 minutes a game for a couple of years, Phaneuf was down under 24 during the lockout shortened 2013 campaign. This trend of more carefully managing Phaneuf’s minutes became even more pronounced during Peter Horachek’s short stint behind the Maple Leafs bench (remember Carlyle was fired in early January). 

Screen Shot 2015-11-24 at 7.19.49 PM


It’s the way that Phaneuf’s minutes dropped following Carlyle’s dismissal, and never topped 16 minutes per game on average at 5-on-5 over the balance of the 2014-15 campaign (over a 25 game rolling sample) that stands out to me. Was it that Horachek elected to cut Phaneuf’s minutes, or was he following an organizational directive?

That Babcock’s usage of Phaneuf at the quarter mark more closely mirrors Horachek’s than Carlyle’s would suggest the latter, but perhaps Babcock just agreed with his immediate, interim predecessor that Phaneuf was better suited to a second-pairing role. We can speculate until we’re blue in the face, but what’s fair to say is that until the firing of Carlyle, Phaneuf was used in a top-pairing role in Toronto and he’s been a second-pairing defender at even-strength deployment-wise since the moment Shanahan first picked his own bench boss.

The results have been favourable for the Maple Leafs, and amusingly, it appears as if Phaneuf’s two-way results improved immediately:

Screen Shot 2015-11-24 at 7.18.03 PM


This season, in a more limited role, Phaneuf is playing some pretty good hockey. 

Fourth on the Maple Leafs in even-strength ice time per game and facing secondary competition matchup-wise, Toronto’s veteran captain has managed a positive team relative shot-attempt differential. Though his on-ice goal differential is inflated by favourable defensive bounces, the Maple Leafs are outscoring their opponents by a wider margin with Phaneuf on the ice at 5-on-5 than they are with any other blue liner. Phaneuf is also on pace for his best offensive season since 2011-12 – and most of that offense has come at evens.

Toronto’s captain has also been placed permanently on the right side point, where he’s more comfortable. Last season the Maple Leafs tasked Phaneuf – a left-handed shooter – to play his strong side, where I thought he fared decently well defensively, but lost most of his offensive value since he couldn’t pull one timers as easily. 

We’d be remiss if we didn’t mention the role of Phaneuf’s defense partners. He’s managed his best results by far on a pair with Jake Gardiner this season, and Gardiner is one the league’s most effective back-hand players when it comes to controlling play. He’s fared considerably worse with both Matt Hunwick and Morgan Rielly. It’s probable that going forward Phaneuf will need to play with an effective puck moving blue line partner, and in their 250 minutes as a pair, Gardiner has proven an excellent fit. 

Phaneuf has the third highest salary among NHL defensemen this season, so he’s paid to be a bona fide 1A guy. In fairness, he is leading all Maple Leafs defensemen in minutes logged, but it’s become apparent that the 1A role isn’t where Phaneuf is best utilized.

It seems to me that the Shanahan regime and Babcock have found a more suitable role for Phaneuf: he’s actually proving to be an effective second pair defender with a shot that demands the respect of opposition penalty killers. 

That might not be worth $8 million in salary, but its helpful. And while having Phaneuf take up $7 million in cap space through the age of 35 could get a bit dicey, with Gardiner signed for the next three seasons and Morgan Rielly cost-controlled by restricted free agency for three years after this one, Toronto might be able to mitigate some of the efficiency issues posed by Phaneuf’s outsized contract. 

  • Jeremy Ian

    It is not only the less icetime, but also the tough zone starts against all the top lines that he used to have to eat, both these situations have been lightened for him and that has made him a much more desirable commodity.

  • STAN

    Thomas, this is a perfect analysis.

    Some readers here might remember my constant criticism of Phaneuf the last few seasons, having watched a mostly different player in Red Deer and Calgary.

    But even I’M impressed by Phaneuf this season. Taking the pressure off and having him defend slightly less talented players has done wonders.

    He’ll never again be the two season dynamo I witnessed in Calgary, but he can certainly be useful over the next couple of seasons.

  • N.Rad

    Also worth mentioning was his atrocious defense partners over the years. Dion is a good player but you can’t expect him to face top line guys with a partner that should be playing on the 2nd or 3rd line (and in some cases the AHL). The best of his partners was (that he had for an extended period) probably Franson, who barely cut it as a 5-6 defenseman on a team (Nashville) with high caliber defense.

  • Gary Empey

    Has anyone noticed the how under Babcock difference between the first and second lines is not as clearly defined as we have seen in the past. So far this year both lines have each combined for 31 points. Is this Babcock’s way of stopping opposing teams from keying on the first line?

  • Gary Empey

    People forget under Carlyle & Wilson Phaneuf was playing on the Left side as opposed to his natural Right side. Now that he’s playing on the Right side again it’s no coincidence that he’s improving